Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

Paws Up!
June 23, 2020

The Dorchester County Council for voting in favor of the 2020 Puppy Mill Ordinance.

Legislation to combat puppy mills, also known as commercial breeders, is an ongoing fight throughout the United States. These breeders are known for heartlessly allowing animals to suffer in deplorable conditions to satisfy demand and greed. Many unsuspecting consumers browse pet stores looking for their next companion, unaware of the hidden illnesses that will arise if they originated from a puppy mill.

In a recent news article, representatives of the Dorchester County Council in South Carolina have joined North Myrtle Beach’s decision to ban cats and dogs from being sold in pet stores with the unanimous approval of 2020 Puppy Mill Ordinance. This ordinance will prohibit pet stores from selling cats or dogs. Any pet store found in violation will have its license suspended.

Take Action: Dorchester County, S.C., residents contact your representative to show your support to help hinder puppy mills from prospering in your area. Other residents, please contact your legislator to show your support to help pass similar legislation.


Do Puppy Mills Have Licenses To Operate?
Shockingly, yes, some of them do have licenses through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

How Are Puppy Mills Allowed To Operate So Inhumanely?
Because the Animal Welfare Act’s standards of care are so low, and the USDA’s guidelines required to obtain a license are too.

Who Is Responsible For Inspecting Puppy Mills?
The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is responsible for inspecting the facilities. Sadly, many annual inspections are not performed due to limited staff.

How Can Puppy Mills Be Stopped?
Local and state lawmakers are passing legislation to prohibit pet stores from selling animals obtained from commercial breeders because the laws they have to follow are so weak.

Learn more about puppy mills and how you can help by downloading our free brochure!

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.