Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

Paws Down! To Alabama poultry farmers profiting from cockfighting and animal trafficking.

June 23, 2020

Animal welfare groups have exposed poultry farms outside of Birmingham, Alabama, as possible participants in a Guam-based cockfighting ring. After pouring over hundreds of pages of shipping records from the Guam Department of Agriculture, investigators have uncovered that these small Alabama poultry farms have been shipping thousands of roosters to the U.S. territory every year. In the poultry industry, it is not lucrative to purchase more roosters than hens, so these roosters are more than likely being used in cruel and barbaric cockfights.

Read more about signs of animal fighting at nhes.org.

Much like dog-fighting, roosters are subjected to abuse, drugs, and “training” for several months before a fight. They often have their feathers plucked out and have razor-sharp blades tied to their feet to inflict great injury to the other bird while onlookers jeer and take bets on the winner. Often times, both birds die at the end of a fight.

While all states in the U.S. have laws against cockfighting and it is considered a federal offense, Alabama only requires a $50 fine for participating in cockfighting and zero jail time. Their antiquated laws have not been updated since the 19th century! It is time for Alabama lawmakers to step up to the plate and demand change.

Take Action: Alabama residents, contact your legislators and tell them to upgrade the laws against cockfighting to be on the same level as your anti-dogfighting laws. Do not participate or be a spectator in animal-related games involving gambling. If you see animal cruelty taking place, contact your local animal control office or police department and report it immediately. No animal deserves to be abused for our entertainment and financial gain!

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.