Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

Paws Up!
May 5, 2020

To Colorado’s Parks and Wildlife Commission for voting favorably to protect its wildlife from senseless killing contests.

Observing wildlife in their natural habitat can evoke a sense of calm, wonder, and even delight to the beholder. Have you ever watched a pair of squirrels scamper around a tree as if they were playing tag? Or have you watched a herd of deer bound across a field? Humans and wildlife have coexisted for centuries, but conflicts have arisen through the degradation of the wildlife’s habitat by humans. In order to help control the wildlife that is displaced, some have organized killing contests. The first organized killing contest took place in Chandler, Arizona, in 1957. These contests encourage senseless, mass killings of sentient beings for prizes or money.

Coyotes are a frequent target for many killing contests. They are viewed as a nuisance due to their tenacity to thrive in any environment. Some research has shown that these mass killings are ineffective and results in coyotes having larger litters to repopulate. Many have opposed these killings, and in 2014 California became the first state to ban wildlife killing contests. Vermont followed in 2018, and then Massachusetts, New Mexico, and Arizona were added in 2019. Recently, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission voted favorably (8-4) to include small game and furbearers to its current ban on wildlife killing contests.


Before this vote, according to the Colorado Revised Statues § 33-6-118, ” It is unlawful for any person to advertise, conduct or offer to conduct, or otherwise promote or participate in any contest or competition involving two or more persons and the monetary payment or awarding of any other prize when the object of the contest or competition involves the killing of any big game or the display for comparison of any big game or any part thereof. Certificates issued by organizations solely for registration and recognition of animals legally taken are not prohibited. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of five hundred dollars and an assessment of twenty license suspension points.”


Take Action: Colorado residents, if you agree that wildlife killing contests should be banned, thank the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission. They are helping to preserve native wildlife. Other U.S. residents, show your support by contacting your State Wildlife Agency, legislator, or news station. Your voice joined with many will help shed light on the many innocent animals harmed for sport.

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.