Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

Paws Down! to the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical School Campus for practicing medical procedures on live pigs.

September 10, 2020

According to a survey conducted by The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, over 70% of medical schools in the United States do not use live animals when practicing medical procedures. This is not the case for the University of Colorado, whose Anschutz Medical School is currently using pigs in practicing surgical procedures such as kidney and gallbladder removals. The pigs are often kept alive for up to eight weeks after these procedures before they are euthanized, according to CPR News.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is filing a complaint to the USDA against the University, claiming the University did not first seek alternatives to using live animals in medical training, which is required under the Animal Welfare Act.

While pigs have been used in medical training for years, more and more universities are realizing the inhumane nature of using live animals for surgical training. Not only is it painful and cruel to the animals, but the experience offers little educational benefit to future doctors who will be performing surgeries on human beings–not animals with a completely different anatomy.

Most universities opt for more humane and accurate teaching techniques that use human-relevant methods such as simulators, virtual reality, and human cadavers. These widely-accepted methods provide medical students with knowledge and experience with human-based procedures without subjecting innocent animals to pain and fear.


  • Write to the USDA urging them to monitor closely the source of animals used in research facilities.
  • Contact universities and colleges using animals to practice surgical and medical procedures and urge them to adopt alternatives
  • If you are a student, contact your instructor well before a class that involves animal dissection and explain orally and in writing why you object to using animals in experiments.
  • Contact your legislators urging them to pass legislation that grants students the option to choose alternatives to classroom dissection.
  • Consider making arrangements to donate all or part of your body and for medical teaching after your death.
Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.