Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

Paws Up! For New Hampshire’s Vote Against Legalizing Private Wildlife Ownership

Most people like Australia’s most famous cultural export, the kangaroo. But would they want one in their home? That is the question legislators in New Hampshire faced when looking at House Bill 1325-FN. Representative Tom Mannion sponsored this bill to lower the legal barriers to privately owning wild animals in New Hampshire. In his public post about the bill, Mannion explained his inspiration came from requests on social media, asking him to put into law the right to own small-tailed monkeys, foxes, raccoons, otters, skunks, and the iconic red kangaroo.

According to Bush Heritage Australia, kangaroos can grow up to two meters in height and can clear more than 8 meters in one leap. They have complex social structures and travel in packs, known as “Mobs”. The confines of a residential area is far removed from a kangaroo’s natural habitat, and doesn’t provide the space or socialization they need. Each species of animal listed as a potential “pet” in HB 1325-FN has their own unique environment to thrive in, none of which includes our homes. Fortunately, you will not see kangaroos hopping down the streets of your neighborhood anytime soon. HB 1325-FN was struck down with a unanimous vote, with representatives and animal advocates alike speaking out against the bill.

Regardless of its fate in the house, HB 1325-FN highlights the troubling rise of the exotic animal trade. This multibillion dollar industry is filled with illegal activity, and a wide lack of regulation leaves exotic animals more vulnerable than other companion animals. Social media has glamorized keeping wild animals as exotic pets with cute videos further feeding the demand. It is our responsibility to speak out for their protection, to pull back the curtain and remind others that these beautiful creatures deserve to be in the wild. The love we have for their kind, however great, will never replace the lives of freedom they are supposed to lead.

Take Action: Contact your New Hampshire Representative to thank them for voting against HB 1325-FN!

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.