Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

There are more tigers living in captivity in the United States than there are in the wild.

April 4, 2020

Last month, millions of Americans tuned in to watch Tiger King, the popular Netflix documentary series that uncovered the seedy underbelly of the roadside zoo industry. While the majority of viewers were captivated by the ever-churning personal drama surrounding the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park in Oklahoma and Big Cat Rescue in Florida, the welfare of the animals these facilities promised to protect was a footnote of the series, at best.

For several years, lawmakers have been trying, albeit unsuccessfully, to pass legislation that would limit the unnecessary exposure of wild animals to the public for financial profit, which is a major form of income for roadside attractions such as the G.W. Exotic Animal Park. These parks will offer the public opportunities to “play with” or pet tiger or lion cubs for a fee (sometimes hundreds of dollars). Once the cubs are grown, they are no longer profitable to the facilities, so they often sell them to other zoos, sell them on the black market, or just euthanize them. Read more about the exotic pet trade.

U.S. Representative Mike Quigley (D-IL) introduced H.R. 1380, or The Big Cat Public Safety Act of 2019, which would impose more restrictions on the trade of big cats such as tigers, lions, cheetahs, and cougars, as well as restricting direct contact between the public and these wild animals. While little has been accomplished with the bill over the last six months, Rep. Quigley is hoping that this documentary will force this crucial legislation into the limelight, according to this recent news article.

Take Action: H.R. 1380, as well as its twin bill in the Senate–S. 2561–is still in committee and waiting to be voted on as a whole. Please urge your legislators to support The Big Cat Public Safety Act today!

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.