Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

December 27, 2019

Several animal welfare organizations have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture after the September approval of a new rule which will further deregulate the factory farm industry, according to a recent news article.

The Swine Slaughter Inspection Rule, which goes into effect on December 30th, 2019, will give slaughterhouses the option to remove the limit on how many pigs may be slaughtered per hour. Since the 1960’s, slaughterhouses were capped at slaughtering a maximum of 1,106 pigs per hour. This regulation was put in place so that USDA inspectors had enough time to inspect each animal before being slaughtered in order to meet government safety and welfare requirements. The new rule will also allow slaughterhouses to decrease the number of USDA inspectors on site, allowing them to assign their own employees to do the critical health and welfare inspections before slaughter. The speed limit also protected slaughterhouse workers by keeping production at a “reasonable” pace. However, with this new rule, workers may be pressured to push as many pigs through the slaughter process as possible in order to maximize output, increasing the likelihood of mistakes and mistreatment of the animals.

“The USDA has underscored that these agency inspections are the best way to detect potentially devastating diseases and to prevent widespread economic harm and disruption of the meat supply. . . .The USDA, through the Slaughter Rule, has abdicated this statutory responsibility and reassigned these inspection duties to the very slaughterhouses it is supposed to regulate.”

Farm Sanctuary v. United States Department of Agriculture

Should slaughterhouses be allowed to regulate themselves? If the factory farm industry has no accountability from outside sources, to what standard will quality of care for the animals, as well as safety of the products, be held? Two federal meat inspectors even admitted that under the new Swine Slaughter Rule, there will be a greater risk for contamination.

Take Action: Please make the safe and humane decision to stop the consumption of pork products–and other animal products–to encourage a more compassionate food industry.

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.