Paws Up!

New York Assemblyman Blumencranz has proposed “Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act” to strengthen protections for sanctuary animals seized by state law enforcement.

     The lives of sanctuary animals in New York may soon receive greater legal protection.

     A proposed amendment to Section 11-0512 of New York’s Environmental Conservation Law, known as Peanut’s Law: Humane Animal Protection Act, would change how the state handles animals seized from sanctuaries.

     The bill follows the widely reported case of Peanut the Squirrel. Peanut was a rehabilitated squirrel who gained a large following online. During an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Peanut was seized and later euthanized.

  At NHES, we believe wild animals that can survive on their own should be released whenever possible. However, wildlife sanctuaries also serve an important purpose. Animals living in these facilities deserve humane and fair treatment.

 

What Would Peanut’s Law Change?

     One of the first goals of Peanut’s Law is to clearly define what qualifies as an animal sanctuary.

     Under the proposal, a sanctuary would include a wild animal care facility recognized under federal and state law and operating under a valid tax identification number, such as a 501(c)(3).

     This definition is important because it helps determine which organizations qualify for legal protections.

     Qualified sanctuaries would also have the right to an administrative hearing before animals are seized.

A 72-Hour Waiting Period

     If passed, Peanut’s Law would also change New York’s rules for euthanasia following an animal seizure.

     The bill would require a 72-hour waiting period before an animal could be euthanized. The only exception would involve an immediate public safety risk confirmed by a licensed veterinarian.

     During those 72 hours, families and sanctuary operators could file an emergency appeal with the DEC.

     An emergency review board would then examine the case. The board would include a licensed veterinarian, a public health official, and a sanctuary representative.

     Together, they would determine the most appropriate course of action.

More Transparency and Accountability

     Peanut’s Law would also create new reporting requirements for the DEC.

     The department would be required to publish quarterly reports explaining animal seizures and their outcomes.

     If euthanasia and rabies testing were necessary, the bill would also require those test results to be made public.

     If an animal tested negative for rabies, licensed sanctuaries would have the legal right to seek redress.

     These protections were inspired in part by Peanut’s case. The people who cared for him at P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary had little legal recourse after he was seized and euthanized on the same day. Peanut later tested negative for rabies.

Protecting Animals While Addressing Public Safety

     In a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, Assemblyman Blumencranz said he hopes Peanut’s Law will balance animal protection, public safety, and respect for sanctuary operators.

     The proposed bill could provide meaningful protections for animals living in licensed sanctuaries. However, it remains unclear whether New York lawmakers will ultimately support the legislation.

     In the meantime, there are still ways you can help wildlife in your own community.

     Support local conservation efforts, respect wildlife habitats, and contact qualified wildlife rehabilitators when an animal needs help. Small actions can reduce the number of wild animals that eventually require sanctuary care.

 

February 20, 2021

To Iowa Senator Chris Cournoyer (R-District 49) for introducing a bill to keep cities and counties from passing breed-specific laws.


In many animal shelters throughout the United States, an abundance of pit bulls are waiting for their forever homes. Sadly, these canine companions are born at a disadvantage because of the stigma surrounding their breed. Unscrupulous individuals who use pit bulls for cruel dog fighting activities have majorly contributed to this stigma, and, often, people view pit bulls as “dangerous or aggressive.” Sadly, when an individual, or another companion animal, is tragically attacked and a pit bull is involved, many cities and counties have chosen to enact breed bans or restrictions, feeling that is the answer to keep their communities safe. These laws affect the fate of many homeless dogs whose breeds are included in these bans or restrictions.

Many dog owners, animal shelters, humane societies, breed-specific rescues, and lawmakers are continually advocating for dogs discriminated against because of their breeds, especially pit bulls. To help individuals see the error in labeling dogs based on their appearance, the National Canine Research Council has compiled data from several visual breed identification studies. The three dogs pictured below are from one study focusing on pit bulls. The DNA tests revealed the following results: (1) the dog on the left is 25%-49% Chinese Shar-Pei & 12.5%-25% Rottweiler, (2) the dog in the middle is 12.5%-24% Beagle, Boxer, Bulldog, Chesapeake Bay Retriever, Dalmatian, Mastiff, and Whippet; and (3) the dog on the right is 50% or more American Staffordshire Terrier and 12.5%-24% Boxer.

(Source: Images used with permission from www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com)


Thankfully, many lawmakers are starting to realize the ineffectiveness of breed bans or restrictions and have started passing new laws based on a dog’s behavior. In Denver, Colorado, pit bulls were banned from living in the city until the law was overturned by residents who voted favorably to pass J2 in November 2020. The new law comes with restrictions to keep owners of pit bulls accountable. It states that individuals are only allowed to have two pit bulls per household. Owners are required to register their dogs with the Denver Animal Protection to receive a special license with their name, address, two contact numbers, proof of spay or neuter surgery, microchipping, current vaccination records, and current pictures of each dog. After three years of good behavior, owners can apply for a general license.

According to a recent news article, lowa Senator Cournoyer has introduced Senate File 143 to amend the current law and restrict cities and counties from passing breed bans and restrictions. Iowa residents, YOU can make a difference for pit bulls and other dogs who are not allowed to live in specific cities or counties because of their breeds. Please contact your legislator today to show your support for Senate File 143 and stop breed-specific legislation in your state!

Red squirrel sitting on a tree stump eating seeds.

Take Action

Contact Governor Hochul and show your support for Peanut’s Law.